[ad_1]
One day before the conservatorship hearing, Jamie Spears has filed documents claiming the John Zabel, the temporary conservator his daughter Britney Spears and her attorney Mathew Rosengart have nominated, isn’t ‘highly qualified.’
Jamie claims that John, who is a certified public accountant, ‘isn’t cutting it’ and that it could be a ‘significant risk’ to her estate since he lacks experience in conservatorship, TMZ claims.
In the filings, Jamie also thinks there’s no reason to replace him since there is no evidence he did a poor job.
The latest: One day before the conservatorship hearing, Jamie Spears has filed documents claiming the John Zabel, the temporary conservator his daughter Britney Spears and her attorney Mathew Rosengart have nominated, isn’t ‘highly qualified’
However, Britney and her attorney Matthew plan on laying out evidence of Jamie’s failures as her conservator in Wednesday’s court appearance.
He claims that John would need to ‘hit the ground running’ since he doesn’t have experience and that is a ‘significant risk.’
Jamie also noted that John allegedly lost $1 million of his own money in a fraudulent real estate investment, which he claims meant he cant do his own due diligence with his own money, the outlet reported.
If he can’t do that with his own money Jamie says the court shouldn’t put Britney’s estate in his hands.
Filing: Jamie claims that John, who is a certified public accountant, ‘isn’t cutting it’ and that it could be a ‘significant risk’ to her estate since he lacks experience in conservatorship, TMZ claims; seen August 28, 2016
The filings show Jamie was only told through Britney’s team that John is a CPA and has senior ‘executive experience in finance and in the entertainment industry,’ per TMZ.
Jamie however also thinks the priority for the judge is to dismantle the conservatorship without a medical evaluation.
He believes there’s no need for a temporary conservator if the entire conservatorship is gone, according to TMZ.
Jamie, Britney and her team as well as Jodi Montgomery, her personal conservator, have all requested the end of her conservatorship.
Court: Jamie however also thinks the priority for the judge is to dismantle the conservatorship without a medical evaluation; seen July 22, 2019
The latest news comes after it was reported by Deadline that the FBI are looking into whether or not the law was broken after it was clamed he hired a security firm to monitor Britney’s communications and what went on in her bedroom without her knowledge or consent.
Jamie has insisted Britney knew about the surveillance arrangements.
In California, both parties must consent to their conversation being recorded.
They have triggered a furious response from Britney’s lawyers who say the allegations are further evidence as to why her conservatorship should be urgently ended.
‘Mr. Spears has crossed unfathomable lines,’ said the singer’s lawyer, Mathew Rosengart, in a court filing on Monday in advance of a hearing on the conservatorship scheduled for Wednesday.
‘While they are not evidence, the allegations warrant serious investigation, certainly by Ms. Spears as, among other things, California is a ‘two-party’ consent state.’
His furious remarks were a reference to a New York Times documentary released on Hulu Friday detailing the surveillance claims.
Alex Vlasov, a former employee of Black Box Security, told The New York Times in a new documentary that the 39-year-old Spears’s phone calls and messages were secretly recorded as part of her 13-year conservatorship, overseen by her father.
Rosengart further told the paper that the allegations made by Vlasov warranted urgent inquiry.
He said it was yet further evidence of the mistreatment of the singer, who on June 23 told the court she was forced to have birth control implants; was forbidden from driving her car; and had no say in her most basic life decisions.
‘Placing a listening device in Britney’s bedroom would be particularly inexcusable and disgraceful, and corroborates so much of her compelling, poignant testimony.
‘These actions must be fully and aggressively investigated.’
On Monday, Britney reacted to the latest documentaries about her life The New York Times, FX, and Hulu series titled ‘Controlling Britney Spears, as well as CNN’s Toxic: Britney Spears’ Battle For Freedom.
Although she did not specify which documentary she was referring to, both were released over the weekend, and Britney said she watched one of them, and told fans that a lot of what she saw was not true.
Addressing fans in a lengthy Instagram post on Monday, she said: ‘I hate to inform you but a lot of what you heard is not true!’
Investigating: The latest news comes after it was reported by Deadline that the FBI are looking into whether or not the law was broken after it was clamed he hired a security firm to monitor Britney’s communications and what went on in her bedroom without her knowledge or consent
Last week, her former tour manager Dan George detailed just how much the star’s conservators have controlled her medical care for over a decade.
In an explosive interview, George came forward with his observations of how the singer, 39, was treated while working with her on the Circus tour from 2008 to 2009 during CNN’s upcoming documentary TOXIC: Britney Spears’ Battle for Freedom.
‘The conservatorship dictated to her who her doctors were going to be, which doctors she was going to see, how often she was going to see them, how long those sessions would be — every aspect of her medical care,’ he said in a preview for one-hour special, obtained by Page Six.
George’s statement comes after Spears testified that her conservatorship was so restrictive that she wasn’t allowed to remove her IUD birth control.
While speaking to Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Brenda Penny in June, the mom-of-two said she just wanted her ‘life back.’
The Gimme More singer has been under a court order for 13 years where her dad has held the power over all of her personal and financial decisions following her multiple involuntary holds in psychiatric hospitals.
To be continued: The Gimme More singer has been under a court order for 13 years where her dad has held the power over all of her personal and financial decisions following her multiple involuntary holds in psychiatric hospitals
[ad_2]
